How do I understand rusks.

To understand rusks in their fullness is quite difficult task. Is almost such difficult as describing current level of understanding, and is such not necessary.

To begin, perhaps, is possible from rusks by themselves, as they simple “are”.

And this is something that has different shapes, with different patterns of “bubbles”, different colors, different densities, different structures. The content is also different: rusks can be made from bread (of different recipes), from other edible “things” (grind and put into the dough, or this something crushed itself will make up the “dough”). Or, one might say, crackers have different qualities.

Rusks do not remain unchanged: they become drier or wolder, for example, or they heat and cool, lose their shape, become different rusks than before, or cease to be rusks as such.

Crackers have a certain measure: starting from the sizes defined for a given source material (crackers), the cracker will begin to change into some other state, it will begin to disintegrate or disappear in such a way that what has already been obtained as a cracker cannot be called.

Rusks, further, can mean something, used for something, intended for something, in other words, they have a certain essence, something different from the rusks themselves, albeit associated with them. Rusks can be used for food, can symbolize something, can have an aesthetic component, can perform functions related to their chemical structure, be a participant in certain chemical reactions, can perform functions as an object (they can be used, although it is undesirable, for example, as a throwing projectile, you can weight something with breadcrumbs, compact something and much, much more).

Then, given that rusks can be perceived directly, as well as the fact that rusks can be perceived indirectly, mediately, have an essence that manifests itself in something else, a “shell” imposed on the rusks, or, in other words, may not be rusks( it is difficult to expand in more detail); given the above so that one is not considered without taking into account the second, or, better to say, is considered in an indivisible unity, we can come to the concept(notion, idea) of rusks. Namely, that which is perceived directly as rusks, and manifests itself as rusks in essence (not just as some kind of object that can be thrown into the distance, for example), while this concept also contains the entire formation of rusks, contains the formation of essence, all variability , unstable stability of rusks — can be called rusks, the concept of rusks.

In the most general terms, thus, the exposition of understanding crackers is expanded.

It is not necessary to understand crackers, as already mentioned at the beginning of the article. If you soak them in eggs and put them in a pan, or soak them in milk, while getting a wonderful dish for every day, then understanding can only harm the matter.